Closed Loop Small Bowel Obstruction Post Robotic Hysterectomy: a Case Report

Document Type : Letter to the Editor

Authors

1 Department of Visceral Surgery, Sud Francilien Hospital, University Paris Sud XI, 91000 Evry, France

2 Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Georges Hospital University Medical Center, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon

3 Department of General Surgery, Saint Georges Hospital University Medical Center, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon

Abstract

Robotic surgery has gone beyond the investigational stage and is now currently being used as the minimally invasive surgery of choice in different disciplines mainly gynecological surgery, urologic surgery and some colorectal surgery procedures. knowing that robotic devices are being continuously evolved and studied, it is expected to be widely disseminated as they become less and less expensive. As robotic surgery grows and disseminate, it is important to keep track of the true incidence of complications, being it related to the system itself or being it related to the known traditional postoperative complication that usually occur after traditional surgery or other minimally invasive modalities. Hence, transparency in reporting such complications is of utmost importance to ensure continued safe innovation and in addition informing patients seeking surgical care about these possible complications. Herein, we report a case of closed loop small bowel obstruction 1 year post robotic hysterectomy done for benign disease.

Keywords

References

  1.  AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: roboticassisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol (2013) 20(l):2–9. doi:10.1016.
  2. Paraiso MF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair. Fertil Steril (2014) 102(4):933–8. doi:10.1016.
  3. Committee Opinion No 701. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):e155– e159.
  4. Foster NM, McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Small bowel obstruction:a population-based appraisal. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203(2):170-176.
  5. Scott FI, Osterman MT, Mahmoud NN, Lewis JD. Secular trends in smallbowel obstruction and adhesiolysis in the United States: 1988-2007. Am J Surg. 2012;204(3):315–320.
  6. Menzies D. Peritoneal adhesions.  Incidence, cause, and prevention. Surg Annu.1992;24 Pt.1:27–45.
  7. Monk BJ, Berman ML, Montz FJ. Adhesions after extensive gynecologic surgery: clinical significance, etiology, and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(5 Pt. 1):1396–1403.
  8. Al-Sunaidi M, Tulandi T. Adhesion-related bowel obstruction after hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1162–1166.
  9. Sheyn D, Bretschneider CE, Mahajan ST, Ridgeway B, Davenport A, Pollard R. Incidence and risk factors of early post-operative small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018.
Iranian Journal of Colorectal Research
Volume 10, Issue 3
September 2022
Pages 119-122

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics