Simple Anal Fistula: Clinical Criteria for Diagnosis and Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation for Surgery -an Observational Study

Document Type : Research/Original Article

Authors

1 Consultant Surgeon, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Mayiam Nagar, Ghaziabad 201003, India

2 Senior Resident, Department of Burns, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India

3 Director Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 10095, India

4 Professor, Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342005, India

5 Director Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 10095, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate (i) acceptability of surgery for simple anal fistula under local anesthesia with conscious sedation by the patients and (ii) accuracy of a set of clinical criteria for diagnosis of simple anal fistula.
METHODS: A set of clinical criteria based on physical findings was used to diagnose patients with simple anal fistula. These patients were operated under local anesthesia with conscious sedation. Intravenous paracetamol, diclofenac sodium, and midazolam were administered as adjuvants. Fistulotomy with/without marsupialisation was performed in most patients. Clinical diagnosis was matched with operative findings.
RESULTS: Among 193 patients presenting with anal fistula, 61 patients were diagnosed as simple anal fistula and were scheduled for surgery under local anesthesia with conscious sedation. One patient was found to have complex anal fistula during intraoperative assessment and surgery was deferred. Surgery could be completed under local anesthesia with conscious sedation for 58/60 (96.7%) patients. Acceptability of the procedure was assessed with two parameters: the patients’ satisfaction score on visual analogue scale and their willingness to undergo fistula surgery under local anesthesia again, if required. Median (interquartile range) visual analogue scale score for patients’ satisfaction was 10 (9-10). All the patients expressed their willingness to undergo fistula surgery under local anesthesia again, if required. The clinical criteria was successful in diagnosing simple anal fistula in 58/61 (95.1%) patients. The remaining three patients had high intersphincteric fistula (1) and blind sinus (2).
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of surgery for simple anal fistula under local anesthesia with conscious sedation was excellent. The proposed clinical criteria were highly accurate in diagnosing simple anal fistula.

Keywords

References

Jain BK, Garg PK. Anal fistula. In: Mishra PK, editor. Textbook of Surgical Gastroenterology. Volume 2. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd; 2016. p. 1009-1022.
2.          Jain BK, Vaibhaw K, Garg PK, Gupta S, Mohanty D. Comparison of a fistulectomy and a fistulotomy with marsupialization in the management of a simple anal fistula: A randomized, controlled pilot trial. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(2):78–82.
3.          Jain BK. Pre-surgery assessment of anal fistula. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2020 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02220-x. [Epub ahead of print]
4.          Nystrom PO, Derwinger K, Gerjy R. Local perianal block for anal surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8:23–26.
5.          Noori IF. Outcome of anorectal surgery under a mixture of local anesthesia: experience with 350 patients. Med J Babylon. 2014;11:776-784.
6.          Park SJ, Choi S Il, Lee SH, Lee KY. Local perianal block in anal surgery: The disadvantage of pain during injection despite high patient satisfaction. J Korean Surg Soc. 2010;78:106–110.
7.          Tsai T, Gadsden J, Connery C. Local infiltration anesthesia. In: Hadzic A, editor. Textbook of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. China: The Mcgraw-Hill Companies; 2007. p. 182-192
8.          Brokelman RBG, Loon CJM Van, Rijnberg WJ. Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthoplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:495-498.
9.          Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EKB, et al. Assessment of pain. BrJAnaesth.2008;101:17–24.
10.        Chung FF, Chant VWS, Ong D. A postanaesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. Ambul Surg. 1993;1:189–193.
11.        Cirocco WC, Reilly JC. It is time to retire Goodsall’s Rule: the Midline Rule is a more accurate predictor of the true and neutral course of anal fistula. Tech Coloproctol. Doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02167-z. epub on 27 Feb 2020.
12.        Garg P, Singh P, Kaur B. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): operative findings correlation in 229 fistula-in-ano patients. World J Surg. 2017; 41: 1618-1624. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3886-x.
13.        Amato A, Bottini C, De Nardi P, Giamundo P, Lauretta A, Realis Luc A, Piloni V. Evaluation and
management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 ;
24:127-143. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02144-1. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
14.        Bubbers EJ, Colongne KG. Management of complex anal fistulas. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;  29:43-49. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1576392.
15.          Buchanan GN, HalliganS, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Tarroni D, Cohen CRG. Clinical examination,
endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparision with
outcome-based reference standard1. Radiology 2004;233:674-681.
16.          Ratto C, Gentile E, Merico M, Spinazzola C, Mangini G, Sofa L, Doglietto G. How can the assessment
of fistula-in-ano be improved? Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43, 1375-1382.
17.          Ommer A, Herold A, Berg E, Furst A, Sailer M, Shiedeck T. Clinical practice guideline:
Cryptoglandular anal fistulas. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 103238/arztebl.2011.0707
18.          Aphinives P. Perianal block for ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy, an easy technique for general surgeon.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92:195-7
19.          Kulkarni S V, Agarwal P, Nagraj K. To compare the outcome of minor anorectal surgeries under local
anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia. Indian J Surg. 2014;76:343–349.
20.        Delikoukos S, Gikas D. The role of local anaesthesia in ambulatory anal surgery. Ambul Surg. 2007;13:64–66.
21.        Díaz-Palacios GA, Eslava-Schmalbach JH. Perirectal block for out-patient anorectal surgery: A new technique. Biomédica. 2011;31:196–199.
22.        Esser S, Khubchandani I, Rakhmanine M. Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia can be performed safely and cost-efficiently. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1164–1169.
23.          Nivatvongs S. Local anesthesia in anorectal surgery. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S, editors. Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum and Anus. 3rd Ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007. p. 117-118.
24.        Nivatvongs S. An improved technique of local anesthesia for anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25:259–260.
25.        Ho KS. Randomized clinical trial of haemorrhoidectomy under a mixture of local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia. Br J Surg. 2000;87:410-413.
26.        Gabrielli F, Cioffi U, Chiarelli M, Guttadauro A, De Simone M. Hemorrhoidectomy with posterior perineal block: experience with 400 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:809–812.
27.        Luck AJ, Hewett PJ. Ischiorectal fossa block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:142–145.
28.        Ong CH, Chee Boon Foo E, Keng V. Ambulatory circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia versus circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under regional anaesthesia. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:184–186.
29.          Delikoukos S, Zacharoulis D, Hatzitheofilou C. Local posterior perianal block for proctologic surgery. Int Surg.;91:348–351.
30.          Argov S, Levandovsky O. Local anesthesia in anal surgery: a simple, safe procedure. Am J surgery 2006:191:111-113
31.        Saranga B R, Sharma V, Dabas AK, Chakladar A. Evidence based switch to perianal block for ano-rectal surgeries. Int J Surg. 2010;8:29–31.
32.        Singh S, Khichy S, Singh B, Attri JP. Comparison of local anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for peri anal disorders. Int J Med Res Rev. 2017;5:223-228.
33.        Li S, Coloma M, White PF, Watcha MF, Chiu JW, Li H, et al. Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1225–1230.
34.        Sekhon M , Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17:88. doi 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
35.          Gandhi A, Legha M, Gothwal S, Bothra AC, Kumar A, Jalthania M. Comparative study of local v/s general & regional anaesthesia in perianal day care surgery. Sch J Appl Med Sci. 2015;3:1000–1004.
                
Iranian Journal of Colorectal Research
Volume 9, Issue 1
March 2021
Pages 24-31

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics