The Fundamental Role of Postoperative Critical Care in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Brief Report

Document Type : Brief Report

Authors

1 1st Department of obstetrics / gynecology National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Aleksadra Hospital, Athens, Greece

2 Departement of Pediatrics Asklepieion Hospital Athens,Greece

3 Devision of GYN/Oncology 1st Departement of Obstetrics/Gynecology , Ntional and Kapoditrian University of Athens, Aleskandra Hospital, Athens, Greece

Abstract

The value of postoperative critical care in gynecologic oncology surgery is crucial for the patient’s further postoperative course. For that reason different levels of postoperative care should exist, in order to identify in an early stage the possible complications and handle them properly . Strict indications of who should be admitted or not, should be defined and surgeons as well anesthesiologists should be aware of them. On the other hand, longer stay in hospital increases the likelihood of complications such as nosocomial infections and late ambulation, increasing morbidity and mortality. Therefore, longer stay in critical care units should be avoided, by predicting if patients are able to move to the general ward and later exit from the hospital. The next step is to set strict protocols for the indications of admission and decreased hospitalization by an accepted scientific team. These protocols should be applied universally in order to achieve the best possible outcomes in patients’ postoperative course.

Keywords


 1. Amir, M., Shabot, M. M., & Karlan, B. Y. (1997). Surgical intensive care unit care after ovarian cancer surgery: An analysis of indications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70366-1
2. Davidovic-Grigoraki, M., Thomakos, N., Haidopoulos, D., Vlahos, G., & Rodolakis, A. (2017). Do critical care units play a role in the management of gynaecological oncology patients? The contribution of gynaecologic oncologist in running critical care units. In European Journal of Cancer Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12438.
3. Eisenkop, S. M., Spirtos, N. M., & Lin, W. C. M. (2006). “Optimal” cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A commentary. In Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.004
4. Heinonen, S., Tyrváinen, E., Penttinen, J., Saarikoski, S., & Ruokonen, E. (2002). Need for critical care in gynaecology: A population-based analysis. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1525
5. Leath, C. A., Kendrick IV, J. E., Numnum, T. M., Straughn, J. M., Rocconi, R. P., Sfakianos, G. P., & Lang, J. D. (2006). Outcomes of gynecologic oncology patients admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery: A university teaching hospital experience. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00702.x
6. Montz, F. J., Holschneider, C. H., Solh, S., Schuricht, L. C., & Monk, B. J. (1994). Small bowel obstruction following radical hysterectomy: Risk factors, incidence, and operative findings. Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1994.1097
7. Sobol, J. B., & Wunsch, H. (2011). Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care. In Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9999
8. Thomakos, N., Zacharakis, D., Rodolakis, A., Zagouri, F., Papadimitriou, C. A., Bamias, A., Dimopoulos, M. A., Haidopoulos, D., Vlahos, G., & Antsaklis, A. (2014). Gynecologic oncology patients in the surgical high dependency unit: An analysis of indications. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3180-1